Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Categories 13.8K
- General Category 10.9K
- General Announcements 184
- Faith Issues 3.4K
- Coptic Orthodox Church 2.5K
- Personal Issues 1.4K
- Prayer Requests 426
- Random Issues 1.8K
- Introductions 295
- Non-Orthodox Inquiries 232
- Youth Corner 607
- Hymns 2.6K
- Hymns Discussion 2.6K
- Technicial Difficulties 370
- Technical Topics 370

Comments
A) You are comitting a straw man fallacy. I did not mention Martin Luther. You are obviously quite ignorant of patristics: St. Ireneous of Lyons and St. Hippolytus are "Western Fathers", and they are "our Church Fathers", and there are many other "Western Fathers" like them who are "our Church Fathers".
Got it?
B) Again yes! Enough ignorance, and address the arguments! Ok?! i) You are contradicting yourself. If St. Clement taught that of the Jews only the righteous were given the opportunity to be saved, then obviously not all those in hades were saved, since you admit that at the very least the unrighteous Jews were hence not saved.
ii) Before you comment on St. Clement, it would be prudent to actually read what he says, as opposed to misrepresenting him just to support your heteredox position. St. Clement clearly states that of the gentiles, only the righteous were saved i.e. those who lived righteously according to their own law and philosophy. Here is a direct quotation from St Clement's Stromata:
"For to those who were righteous according to the law, faith was wanting. Wherefore also the Lord, in healing them, said, "Thy faith hath saved thee." But to those that were righteous according to philosophy, not only faith in the Lord, but also the abandonment of idolatry, were necessary. Straightway, on the revelation of the truth, they also repented of their previous conduct." (Book 6 Chapter 6)
C) I will surely educate you my ignorant friend, and put you in your place. To further crush your credibility as a spokesperson for what is Orthodox, I will now go on to prove that you are directly opposing the teaching of the Church as represented by her Orthodox heriarchs (i.e. figures who have the authority to proclaim Orthodoxy) and her Liturgical rites:
Here is what His Holiness Pope Shenouda III has to say on the issue:
From page 68 of his book Doctrinal Theology: Furthermore, Coptic theologian Ferial Moawad states in his Commentary on the first epistle of Peter, in relation to the verses in question: Furthermore In The Spirituality of The Praise According To The Rite Of The Coptic Orthodox Church, H.G. Bishop Anba Mettaous states on page 95: His Grace then goes on to state: In interpreting this further he emphasizes the connection between the three young saints and the righteous: In his Contemplations on the Resurrection, His Holiness Pope Shenouda reiterates the same principle mentioned above in point a) when he states on page 113: And again on page 78 of Many Years with the Peoples Questions Volume II, he states that the purpose of Christ’s descent into hades was to: In The Work of the Cross by Coptic theologian Maged Attia, he states on page 12: In the Fraction To The Son For the Resurrection of the Coptic Liturgy it states: Via poetic parallel, the freed captives are equated with the uplifted Saints. Again, only the righteous from were redeemed from hades.
Fr Tadros Malaty also raitifies the patristic understanding that only the righteous were vindicated from hades when he states in his book Christ in the Eucharist on page 102: Fr. Tadros Malaty states also in his commentary of 1 Samuel states in relation to the events of chapter 17: Thank you for further exposing your ignorance of Orthodox patristics. John the Damascene is not a Church Father. He was a Chalcedonian Father, a Father of a Church in schism.
Furthermore, you have evaded my argument. You can go to your online website article like a robot and paste as many Fathers as you want. In the end they are all being taken out of context to support heresy. In context, it is clear that the term "all" in any of their comments or remarks is not intended literally. The context of their writings qualifies them positions as clearly intending "all the righteous".
But then again, you do not know how to approach patristics. You have appealed to Origen on the very matter for which the Church condemns him, you have disregarded "Western Fathers" as being "Church Fathers", and you have appealed to Fathers who existed outside the canonical boundaries of the Church as authority figures. Please do not attempt to represent yourself as a spokesperson for Orthodoxy; you evidently know nothing. Do the prudent thing, and learn instead of assume.
John Damascene
If you are refering to St John's work An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, he does not seem to support your theory.
In fact he states: He "became to those who believed the Author of everlasting salvation and to those who did not believe a reproach of their unbelief, so He might become the same to those in Hades: That every knee should bow to Him, of things in heaven, and things in earth and things under the earth. And thus after He had freed those who had been bound for ages, straightway He rose again from the dead, shewing us the way of resurrection."
So St. John is clearly saying here that to those in Hades He became everlasting salvation for believers, but a reproach to the unbelievers.
But, of course, as Iqbal rightly pointed out, if one is arguing about patristics within the framework of the non-Chalcedonian communion, St. John's opinion is superflous.
Are you here to learn and contribute, or are you here to be funny?
This is a sin in itself
then, ... he hung himself and committed suicide on a tree when he realized what he did
he felt unworthy of living although he could have still confessed like the robber on the right hand of jesus on the cross.
However, he sinned again by commitikng suicide killing himself and going staright to hell.
The worst sin a person could EVER DO IS COMMIT SUICIDE because they go straight to hell because they dont have chance to confess. even if you are a saint and you for some reason likely not commit suicide, you go to hell because that one sin cannot be redeemed.
Amen