Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Categories 13.8K
- General Category 10.9K
- General Announcements 184
- Faith Issues 3.4K
- Coptic Orthodox Church 2.5K
- Personal Issues 1.4K
- Prayer Requests 426
- Random Issues 1.8K
- Introductions 295
- Non-Orthodox Inquiries 232
- Youth Corner 607
- Hymns 2.6K
- Hymns Discussion 2.6K
- Technicial Difficulties 369
- Technical Topics 369
Validity of different Cantors
How do we decide if a source for a hymn is valid? Does it depend on the famousness of the cantor in the recording?

Comments
He is not even an Archdeacon, he shouldn’t necessarily be. Also, he did not learn from Cantor Mikhail the Great.
(Side note: I think that the archdeacon of the cathedral should be called the Arshiarshidiakon/Archarchdeacon :D)
Regardless, most churches follow either Mlm. Ayad or HICS for Coptic and Arabic, and (at least on the East coast of the US) Coptic Hymns in English is the de facto authority in English. Also, I believe he briefly studied under Mlm. Mikhail, but not exclusively or extensively.
He's just another source but by far the clearest and the most well know in the world, being Pope Shenouda's deacon after Archdeacon Fahim refused to leave the old cathedral in Cairo. He actually didn't learn directly from M Mikhail but for sure had early access to them when they were still on records. The thing is thoo, that is not a measure--learning from m Mikhail.
Coptic hymns in english is an ok source, but not the best TBH. The idea in general is problematic since agreeing on text is problematic. But I won't get into that topic.