Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Categories 13.8K
- General Category 10.9K
- General Announcements 184
- Faith Issues 3.4K
- Coptic Orthodox Church 2.5K
- Personal Issues 1.4K
- Prayer Requests 426
- Random Issues 1.8K
- Introductions 295
- Non-Orthodox Inquiries 232
- Youth Corner 607
- Hymns 2.6K
- Hymns Discussion 2.6K
- Technicial Difficulties 369
- Technical Topics 369

Comments
For gb to equate to Klingon and Esperanto is to have another name than Coptic and to not depend on the text used by the church as originally a different language.. have you ever heard on wrong language teaching, or are they each called a new dialect or a variant of such a language?
Oujai
Oujai
Manuscripts from as old as the tenth and ninth centuries prove the authenticity of Bohairic and its relationship to the Demotic language. Not only that but it is structurally different yet linguistically similar to Sa'idic and Akhmimic. If anything it was the Coptic language that influenced the Arabic language and not the severe.
Unfortunately by the time of the 19th century the Bohairic has died down considerably but not the Sa'idic. Therefore due to ignorance and other political reasons the need for Hellenising the Coptic language arose. However because Sa'idic dialect was still more or less surviving as a dialect for communication the former was referred to as Bohairic. When coptologists and other scientists discovered and brought to use the old Bohairic manuscripts the pro gb boffins started to distinguish it calling it Greco-Bohairic!
So in a nutshell the gb was a fabricated dialect based on the premise that Coptic uses Greek letters hence it ought to be pronounced as Greek. Pope Kyrollos IV may not have had any problems spreading Coptic by any means necessary but unfortunately the one he allocated that job to wasn't up to the task in a strictly scientific sense, or even loosely for that matter.
All what I mentioned is recorded historically and you just need to spend a couple of hours googling sources that are reliable enough and you'll understand. There's no need to venture any guesses or personal deductions. Pray for me I am currently undertaking the project of translating Erian Moftah's book but that is still going to take a long while
Oujai
Doesn't the hymn go "o kyrios meta so, Agios Esteen..." How are they 2 distinct hymns?
in old Egyptian language the r sound is found unspelt in some words, but I like you have questioned the etymology particularly of Embare7.. you may be right, or may not be, I guess the main point is to not blindly follow research done by others. I still highly believe it is from Coptic, or at least a bit of both..
about wala you strike me as having lived long parts of your life outside the Arab world, so probably it's to do with your pronunciation that Egyptians didn't understand what you mean. The word is very widespread and I mean very, and doesn't have any regional variations..
oujai
Al7agar and its plural ala7gar are originally Arabic words while altub and its singular altubah are words that found their way to Arabic through the Egyptian language..
as for wala you're right when you pronounce the word carefully or slowly but in day to day language it's used as such.. pretty much like Tadros for Tawadros, and tedakeya for taodakeya..
oujai
thank you for your trust in me.. I don't see how this could in any sense of the word have anything to do with Mr Moftah.. in fact that is the complete opposite.. in any case I respect your wish in not wanting to get into this..
honestly speaking besides a number of issues that are hampering me from completing translation of the book I recently started feeling as shocking as it may sound, but seriously, like I'm wasting away my days in nonsense, not even worth to be called banter.. the scientific material worthy of critique if that's to be found anywhere in the book in the first place doesn't exceed more than five percent. I have had to stop for now for at least the next couple of months but until someone else who is less busy with their time and able to dedicate themselves to the work it'll be me, but not sure when or how I can resume.. if there's any urgency I suggest you request someone who reads Arabic to read it to you and translate as they go along if indeed it makes sense to them as it is absolutely full of tangential arguments and remarks in an old Arabic speaking style that is not easily understandable if at all..
oujai
Link to Abouna Shenouda's Thesis which touches upon this:
https://copticsounds.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/online-emile-maher-ishaks-the-phonetics-and-phonology-of-the-bohairic-dialect-of-coptic/
We have to go back to origin of language NOT only some words. I understand that Heiroglyphic is original, then demotic > coptic, also >PreSinatic > Kaananite/ Phenician and from this Greek/Latin all european And Semetic languages.of course european lainguestic know but try to skip the step of Heiroglyphic link and only mention Phenician origin. If you want I can send some links to these facts