Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Categories 13.8K
- General Category 10.9K
- General Announcements 184
- Faith Issues 3.4K
- Coptic Orthodox Church 2.5K
- Personal Issues 1.4K
- Prayer Requests 426
- Random Issues 1.8K
- Introductions 295
- Non-Orthodox Inquiries 232
- Youth Corner 606
- Hymns 2.6K
- Hymns Discussion 2.6K
- Technicial Difficulties 368
- Technical Topics 368
Bible translated by PROTESTANTS?!!
I heard that the bible was originally translated by protestants . Is this true or false?
I aslo wanted to ask: why were there 7 books excluded from the bible- i know one of the is the book of Sirach.
I aslo wanted to ask: why were there 7 books excluded from the bible- i know one of the is the book of Sirach.

Comments
cya
Ohhh, hello.... our sunday school teacher told us kinda about publishing bibles and all that a few weeks ago. The protestants publish the books coz otherwise it would be too expensive to publish them ourselves with our ways and things. A lot of stuff is missing from it because it is published by them so it follows their rules if u get me...??? yeh i dont know if that helps but yeh. I dont know if it is translated by them tho soo yeh
cya
That's what I was taught too... must've been the same person who told us this ;)
I suspect you might find that this (as so many things in life) is quite a complex issue. Bible translation is a minefield. I suspect that there isn't any one translation that everyone will ever be happy about. Different groups and different poeple have translated the bible for different purposes throughout history. It is likely that almost any translation out there will in some small (or sometimes big ways) reflect the theological position of those who did the translation. And yes, many of the most recent and modern translations have been made by protestants. Invariably some of their own theological biases will creep into the text. Do these small 'mistakes' or changes in translation radically alter the message of the whole text? In most cases the answer is no. Translations also differe based on the theory of translation underpinning the text. Some translators make 'interpretive traslations' where they try to 'interpret' the meanings behind the text. (I am sometimes slighlty wary of these translations.) Other translators attempt to make 'literal' translations. Biases creep into both kinds of translations, but I prefer literal translations. Father Thomas Hopko, an Eastern Orthodox Priest, has a podcast on Ancient Faith Radio. In two or three of his most recent podcasts, where he discusses reading the bible and english bible translations, he discussed the issues surrounding buble translation. I would suggest listening to this. The link is:
http://ancientfaith.com/podcasts/hopko
Best Wishes
Gerhard
Thank you and god bless
PFMW
You can read the Deuterocanon here at the bottom of the page: http://st-takla.org/pub_Deuterocanon/Deuterocanon-Apocrypha_El-Asfar_El-Kanoneya_El-Tanya__0-index.html
However when the protestant reformation came about this became a hot button issue. Martin Luther (a german monk) was displeased with many Catholic practices (such as indulgences, insistence on latin scripture, corrupt clergy, etc). But specifically he took issue with the fact that the Catholic Church insisted on maintaining the scriptures in latin, and thus no lay person would even be able to read the Bible. During the reformation he wanted to translate the scriptures into German (his native tongue) and other vernacular languages. At this time he had two choices, he could either have translated the Bible from the Catholic latin scripture (which is based on the Septuagint Old Testament, the same as the Orthodox) or he could have used the Jewish Old Testament to translate it. In order to stray as far as possible from the Catholic Church he elected to use the Jewish Old Testament even though all of Christendom had previously used the Septuagint. An interesting side story is that he also wanted to axe the Epistle of St. James due to the verse "Faith without works is dead" because it opposes the Protestant doctrine of Justification (but thats another topic for another time :P). He wasnt concerned with accuracy as much as he wanted to spite the Catholics. In response the Catholics held the council of Trent and excommunicated him BUT it reaffirmed the Septuagint, naming the books, Martin Luther omitted, the Deutro cannon (or literally second cannon). To this day the Catholics and Orthodox use the exact same Bible (with some different names) and the Protestants use the Jewish Old Testament. The only reason most Bibles around are Protestant is due to the massive amounts of resources and freedom protestant publishers have had especially here in the west in comparison to The Orthodox Church which has faced much suppression the entire way (perfect example is the Coptic Orthodox Church).
SORRYYYYYY for the huge post and I hope this cleared up any issues anyone was having.
Pray for me