It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
you are interpreting St. Irenaeus writings just to suit your point of view
Clear to whom? You? I do not understand it that way. No translation conveys what what you are suggesting. Neither the fathers convey what you are suggesting.This is about what you really want to believe.
It is not about "giants" vs "irrelevant" fathers. it just comes to show that we do have the first 300 years of Christians, and maybe Jews as well, who believed this, whereas afterwards, at least with St. Augustine and ST. John Cassian, we see a different interpretation FOR THE FIRST TIME in patristic exegesis. The Nephilim story makes for a great discussion, but it's not do-or-die theology.
When you get into one of those denial modes, it is hard to make you snap out of it.
Tertullian not a father? Tertullian is considered the father of Latin Christianity.
You should rewrite your post as "Not a father according to some in the Coptic Church." I'm not going to reopen the other thread. But this definitely seems like cherry-picking fathers.