It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
After the Arabs invaded in the 7th century, Copts became estranged from the Greek language, which also created a "void" in Coptic theological knowledge during the Middle Ages.
If St Athanasius and St Cyril say the same exact thing as Anslem and Aquinas, would it automatically be wrong to quote Anslem and Aquinas? Shouldn't we care more about the content of references rather than the number of Latin references exceeding Coptic theologian references?
We ought to know who are the Orthodox teachers and become their disciples.
Of course it does matter. If they are really saying the same thing, then I do quote my Fathers.
You assume anything and anyone who is not Coptic is "secretly bringing destructive heresies".
But you will know them by their fruit. The content of their words is the fruit.
If their claims have Truth, it will bring peace.
It's not all claims by Teacher X are heretic and bring destruction and all claims by Coptic Teacher Y are Truth.
I rarely quote Coptic Fathers, but I use the fathers of the EO church to analyze my dogmas. My sources do not stop at St. Cyril, but continue through St. Maxemous the confessor all the way through St. John of Damascus. I take them as my fathers, and I do not restrict God to certain denomination.
We ought to know what the Truth is, where Christ can be found in the Truth regardless of the teacher or messenger and become Christ's disciples through the maternal guidance and love of the Orthodox Church.
If there is an Orthodox Father to quote, its much safer to accept their terminology and reasoning rather than to try to explain our beliefs through potentially foreign arguments.