Proof of the Bible

edited December 1969 in Faith Issues
hey u guys
i was sorta arguing with one of my friends the other day, and when we debate, our arguements go from one subject to another... so i sorta need help
one of the topics he brought up was that we dont know that the events of the Bible actually happened... like that the prophecies were fulfilled... he says that its impossible for someone to record something 30 years later.
he questioned how these prophets, dicsiples, etc, knew what happened if they hadnt even witnessed it
he's roman catholic and i just wanted to know what ur opinions and facts are so i can confront him next time this subject comes up with him or nyone else
plz, any facts on how the Bible was written and when, will be most helpful
thanx in advance
sincerely yours,
troubled and confuddled :(


  • SMS, I get that comments like that all the time!! People who say, the Bible was written by men (not GOD) and so it's completely subjective and based on opinion and perception not reality. I cant deny it was written by men; so I never know how to respond.
  • Why is it impossible to record something thirty years later? World War II happened over 50 years ago, but I can still talk to those imvolved and record those much more so the Bible- written by men INSPIRED by God.
  • What kind of Roman Catholic is he? Probably not active.

    (From: The Catechism of the Catholic Church)

    101 In order to reveal himself to men, in the condescension of his goodness God speaks to them in human words: "Indeed the words of God, expressed in the words of men, are in every way like human language, just as the Word of the eternal Father, when he took on himself the flesh of human weakness, became like men."63

    102 Through all the words of Sacred Scripture, God speaks only one single Word, his one Utterance in whom he expresses himself completely:64
    You recall that one and the same Word of God extends throughout Scripture, that it is one and the same Utterance that resounds in the mouths of all the sacred writers, since he who was in the beginning God with God has no need of separate syllables; for he is not subject to time.65

    103 For this reason, the Church has always venerated the Scriptures as she venerates the Lord's Body. She never ceases to present to the faithful the bread of life, taken from the one table of God's Word and Christ's Body.66

    104 In Sacred Scripture, the Church constantly finds her nourishment and her strength, for she welcomes it not as a human word, "but as what it really is, the word of God".67 "In the sacred books, the Father who is in heaven comes lovingly to meet his children, and talks with them."68


    105 God is the author of Sacred Scripture. "The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit."69

    "For Holy Mother Church, relying on the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books of the Old and the New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church herself."70

    106 God inspired the human authors of the sacred books. "To compose the sacred books, God chose certain men who, all the while he employed them in this task, made full use of their own faculties and powers so that, though he acted in them and by them, it was as true authors that they consigned to writing whatever he wanted written, and no more."71

    107 The inspired books teach the truth. "Since therefore all that the inspired authors or sacred writers affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures."72

    108 Still, the Christian faith is not a "religion of the book." Christianity is the religion of the "Word" of God, a word which is "not a written and mute word, but the Word is incarnate and living".73 If the Scriptures are not to remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must, through the Holy Spirit, "open [our] minds to understand the Scriptures."74


    109 In Sacred Scripture, God speaks to man in a human way. To interpret Scripture correctly, the reader must be attentive to what the human authors truly wanted to affirm, and to what God wanted to reveal to us by their words.75

    110 In order to discover the sacred authors' intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression."76

    111 But since Sacred Scripture is inspired, there is another and no less important principle of correct interpretation, without which Scripture would remain a dead letter. "Sacred Scripture must be read and interpreted in the light of the same Spirit by whom it was written."77

    The Second Vatican Council indicates three criteria for interpreting Scripture in accordance with the Spirit who inspired it.78

    112 1. Be especially attentive "to the content and unity of the whole Scripture". Different as the books which compose it may be, Scripture is a unity by reason of the unity of God's plan, of which Christ Jesus is the center and heart, open since his Passover.79

    The phrase "heart of Christ" can refer to Sacred Scripture, which makes known his heart, closed before the Passion, as the Scripture was obscure. But the Scripture has been opened since the Passion; since those who from then on have understood it, consider and discern in what way the prophecies must be interpreted.80

    113 2. Read the Scripture within "the living Tradition of the whole Church". According to a saying of the Fathers, Sacred Scripture is written principally in the Church's heart rather than in documents and records, for the Church carries in her Tradition the living memorial of God's Word, and it is the Holy Spirit who gives her the spiritual interpretation of the Scripture (". . . according to the spiritual meaning which the Spirit grants to the Church"81).

    114 3. Be attentive to the analogy of faith.82 By "analogy of faith" we mean the coherence of the truths of faith among themselves and within the whole plan of Revelation.

    The senses of Scripture

    115 According to an ancient tradition, one can distinguish between two senses of Scripture: the literal and the spiritual, the latter being subdivided into the allegorical, moral and anagogical senses. The profound concordance of the four senses guarantees all its richness to the living reading of Scripture in the Church.

    116 The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation: "All other senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal."83

    117 The spiritual sense. Thanks to the unity of God's plan, not only the text of Scripture but also the realities and events about which it speaks can be signs.

    1. The allegorical sense. We can acquire a more profound understanding of events by recognizing their significance in Christ; thus the crossing of the Red Sea is a sign or type of Christ's victory and also of Christian Baptism.84

    2. The moral sense. The events reported in Scripture ought to lead us to act justly. As St. Paul says, they were written "for our instruction".85

    3. The anagogical sense (Greek: anagoge, "leading"). We can view realities and events in terms of their eternal significance, leading us toward our true homeland: thus the Church on earth is a sign of the heavenly Jerusalem.86

    118 A medieval couplet summarizes the significance of the four senses:
    The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;
    The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.87
    119 "It is the task of exegetes to work, according to these rules, towards a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of Sacred Scripture in order that their research may help the Church to form a firmer judgement. For, of course, all that has been said about the manner of interpreting Scripture is ultimately subject to the judgement of the Church which exercises the divinely conferred commission and ministry of watching over and interpreting the Word of God."88

    But I would not believe in the Gospel, had not the authority of the Catholic Church already moved me.89


    120 It was by the apostolic Tradition that the Church discerned which writings are to be included in the list of the sacred books.90 This complete list is called the canon of Scripture. It includes 46 books for the Old Testament (45 if we count Jeremiah and Lamentations as one) and 27 for the New.91

    The Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1 and 2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings, 1 and 2 Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah, Tobit, Judith, Esther, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Song of Songs, the Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (Ecclesiasticus), Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Baruch, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zachariah and Malachi.

    The New Testament: the Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the Acts of the Apostles, the Letters of St. Paul to the Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, the Letter to the Hebrews, the Letters of James, 1 and 2 Peter, 1, 2 and 3 John, and Jude, and Revelation (the Apocalypse).

    The Old Testament

    121 The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value,92 for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.

    122 Indeed, "the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men."93 "Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional,"94 the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God's saving love: these writings "are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way."95

    123 Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism).
  • The New Testament

    124 "The Word of God, which is the power of God for salvation to everyone who has faith, is set forth and displays its power in a most wonderful way in the writings of the New Testament"96 which hand on the ultimate truth of God's Revelation. Their central object is Jesus Christ, God's incarnate Son: his acts, teachings, Passion and glorification, and his Church's beginnings under the Spirit's guidance.97

    125 The Gospels are the heart of all the Scriptures "because they are our principal source for the life and teaching of the Incarnate Word, our Savior".98

    126 We can distinguish three stages in the formation of the Gospels:

    1. The life and teaching of Jesus. The Church holds firmly that the four Gospels, "whose historicity she unhesitatingly affirms, faithfully hand on what Jesus, the Son of God, while he lived among men, really did and taught for their eternal salvation, until the day when he was taken up."99

    2. The oral tradition. "For, after the ascension of the Lord, the apostles handed on to their hearers what he had said and done, but with that fuller understanding which they, instructed by the glorious events of Christ and enlightened by the Spirit of truth, now enjoyed."100

    3. The written Gospels. "The sacred authors, in writing the four Gospels, selected certain of the many elements which had been handed on, either orally or already in written form; others they synthesized or explained with an eye to the situation of the churches, the while sustaining the form of preaching, but always in such a fashion that they have told us the honest truth about Jesus."101

    127 The fourfold Gospel holds a unique place in the Church, as is evident both in the veneration which the liturgy accords it and in the surpassing attraction it has exercised on the saints at all times:
    There is no doctrine which could be better, more precious and more splendid than the text of the Gospel. Behold and retain what our Lord and Master, Christ, has taught by his words and accomplished by his deeds.102

    But above all it's the gospels that occupy my mind when I'm at prayer; my poor soul has so many needs, and yet this is the one thing needful. I'm always finding fresh lights there; hidden meanings which had meant nothing to me hitherto.103

    The unity of the Old and New Testaments

    128 The Church, as early as apostolic times,104 and then constantly in her Tradition, has illuminated the unity of the divine plan in the two Testaments through typology, which discerns in God's works of the Old Covenant prefigurations of what he accomplished in the fullness of time in the person of his incarnate Son.

    129 Christians therefore read the Old Testament in the light of Christ crucified and risen. Such typological reading discloses the inexhaustible content of the Old Testament; but it must not make us forget that the Old Testament retains its own intrinsic value as Revelation reaffirmed by our Lord himself.105 Besides, the New Testament has to be read in the light of the Old. Early Christian catechesis made constant use of the Old Testament.106 As an old saying put it, the New Testament lies hidden in the Old and the Old Testament is unveiled in the New.107

    130 Typology indicates the dynamic movement toward the fulfillment of the divine plan when "God [will] be everything to everyone."108 Nor do the calling of the patriarchs and the exodus from Egypt, for example, lose their own value in God's plan, from the mere fact that they were intermediate stages.


    131 "And such is the force and power of the Word of God that it can serve the Church as her support and vigor, and the children of the Church as strength for their faith, food for the soul, and a pure and lasting fount of spiritual life."109 Hence "access to Sacred Scripture ought to be open wide to the Christian faithful."110

    132 "Therefore, the study of the sacred page should be the very soul of sacred theology. The ministry of the Word, too - pastoral preaching, catechetics and all forms of Christian instruction, among which the liturgical homily should hold pride of place - is healthily nourished and thrives in holiness through the Word of Scripture."111

    133 The Church "forcefully and specifically exhorts all the Christian faithful. . . to learn the surpassing knowledge of Jesus Christ, by frequent reading of the divine Scriptures. Ignorance of the Scriptures is ignorance of Christ.112

    I get annoyed with those who claim to be Catholic or Orthodox or Muslim, but have no clue what their religion teaches. It is an abuse of the name.
  • I like your thinking Michael_Thoma,

    What's ur opinion on Intercession?

  • the Bible was written by men, but the author is the Holy Spirit
  • wow... thanx Michael_Thoma!!!
    lol, that was great!
    just one ?: The Catechism of the Catholic Church
    what is that?
    even though Michael_Thoma covered most of it, ny new opinions are welcome

    i just reread the convo i had with him (i know, its pitiful but i need answers) and someof his other arguements was that the Bible was not error free, that it was impossible to be because it was translated over and over again
    and then he stated that Lutheranism came out of the disagreement on one word... is that true? so i dont know how to defend that back... as u can c, he's one knowledgable kid!

    he also stated that at the time the church had personal motivations, so were the ppl writing these gospels... (his words not mine:)
    "but here's the thing: there were many, many more Gospels written than what were accepted as canon... none of the original Gospel writers had any intent of making it into an actual New Testament"
    "the church was as much a political power as it was an instrument for spreading the faith"
    "the way the books are contained in the Old Testament aren't in the chronological order in which they were written"
    "the other two sections of the Old Testament were switched around to better transition into the New Testament"
    "the writers who wrote their Gospels that were later included in the New Testament already had a full knowledge of the Torah... since they all believed in what Jesus preached, they automatically would have had some bias in trying to make events match it"
    "the author's of the Bible all had different points of view"

    okay, im not gonna quote every single thing he said, but goes to show u he had good arguements, and my answers were all based on faith and were temporarily good... until the next time this comes up... but he keeps on going ot the arguement that Jesus spoke Aramiac and toher languages and the Bible was written in severaly different languages, so how can we know for sure that this is perfect?

    " no matter how heavenly ordained the translators were, they were only human...and as such, imperfect"

    then for those of u who read my posts on islam... he said that the pope is willing to kiss the koran, then he proved it:

    so i need ur advice and help here... thanx for all the help given and that will be recieved
  • okay you guys..... i really really need answers to the above post.... i deleted it and reposted it in the hopes of having it get your attention, but that didn't go to well, obviously,
    so any thoughts or comments will be VERY greatly appreciated!
  • Lutheranism came out of Luther's disregard for authority, his psychologically deranged fear of being sent to hell...and after Luther mis-translated the Bible, he added the word sola (alone) to Paul's writing "The just will live by faith (alone, Luther's addition).
    The members of the Church did have personal motivation - to spread their Faith in Christ. The Bible may be translated wrongly, but we believe it because the Church teaches it, we don't believe it on our own like Protestants. Yes the translators are not infallible, but the Church is, therefore we believe what She teaches. We don't accept every translation of the Bible, only the ones the Church backs up. The Gospel writers have different points of view, but having different points of view doesn't make them all wrong. If three people see an accident, all three are telling their version, the policeman or judge sorts them through and completes the event. The same way, we have all the points of view - they are all True, but different perspectives - the Church sorts them through and tells us the complete Truth.
    The Pope wasn't kissing the Koran to equate it to the Bible, but to show that the Truths of Islam are from God, because all Truth is from God.
  • wow, very very nicely put Michael_Thoma
    very nicely put :D
    one last ? lol, i promise: what's the Cathiesm of the Catholic Church where you got all that information from?
  • The Catechism of the Catholic Church is the basic doctrine and faith of the Catholic Church. The English translation is a bit lacking, but it is good for general use. If you want a copy, just look it up on any bookseller , etc. Any library should have it.
  • o wow.... Thanx sooooo much!
    I'll be sure to look that up during the summer. If anybody else has any book reccomendations about the Bible and other religons, please let me know so that I may research them during the summer.
    I'm always interested in what others believe in and how they think and their cultures
    Thanx ;)
  • good book... Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis
    don't let the title fool you.. he in know way undermines Christianity.. he just titles it that because he stresses how lightly people take it.. good book if you're ready for some self reflection on where you stand.
  • and if you like C.S. Lewis's Mere Christianity, you'll definitely like The Screwtape Letters....sorry, just had to say that since Mary brought it up....back to the topic now...

    - Chris
Sign In or Register to comment.