I have Done research on population Genetics and a few things strike me,firstly if we downwind all the haplotypes we get haplotype L and A being the father/mother haplotypes of all mankind,these haplotypes are mostly found in africa.so I assume that adam and eve were either africans or some pre-homo sapien hominid.or that adam and eve is figurative for mankind's fall when he began to cultivate grains wich resulted in warfare,inequality,hierarchical systems and classism previousely not found among hunter gatherer societies.
the problem with noah being literal is that while the obvious problems with a global flood can be explained away by God altering the laws of physics,the major problem arises with the Table of nations.
the Table of nations to put it bluntly,is false.there was no shem being the originator of semites.J and E1b1b1 arise from africa namely somalia,mediterenneans and neolithic european farmers(thats the second wave of europeans,before the indo-european pastoralist migrations) were J and E1b1b1,they are the exact same people as middle easterners,E1b1b1 is a clearly african lineage,its found and originated in ethiopia/somalia.so the whole meditereneans being descended from some ''Japethic''ancestor is false when taking the real history of europe minto account.now surely meditereneans have some R indo european''japethic''lineages but thats due to later invasions and migrations of central asian indo europeans into europe wich imposed their language on most europeans(the Basque escaped the assimilation,as did the Sardinians atleast Genetically).but even then I'll show you why Japethic lineages are in fact hamitic again and are african in origin .
You have haplogroup P.Haplogroup P is the direct father clade of haplogroup Q(wich is a native american haplogroup wich all natives have paternally,but is also found interestingely in Armenia of all places).but its also the direct father clade of haplotype R.R and its derivatives are the so called aryqan,indo european Japethic lineages.so natives and aryans are both just japethic brothers right?Wrong!
P is a papuan lineage.its found exclusively in australoid populations.that makes sence as the first humans were africans,then they migrated to eurasian continent and would become australoids having formed new haplotypes from Genetic african haplotypes but retaining their phenotype,and these australoids would give birth to all other races.as Robert lindsay the anthro blogger put it:''we are all australoids''.Genetics simpely support this conclusion.the only option si that Population Genetics is a massive conspiracy and the Noah story is right,but there are massive problems with this theory.
I believe adam and eve were real and that Enoch was real.but noah just seems unlikely unless he was a local middle easterner who did go ona ark locally but that his Table of nations was just poetry or metaphor,because the Table of Nations is incompatible with population Genetics,we can see wich haplogroups downwind from wich haplogroups and all of it support a originally out of africa then out of australoid theory for all human races.noone with the slightest knwoeldge of population Genetics would argue this.
now heres why Adam and Eve must have been hominids but not homo sapiens...we have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA within us..well atleast all non africans.modern africans have minor neanderthal but thats due to eurasian back migration within the last 3000 years.basically eurasians went back to africa,mated with the women and thus they gave africans minor neanderthal dna.but Im not even sure all africans have it.
the problem again with Noah is that if we assume that noah had three sons and they had 3 wives,then neanderthal and densovan dna should be spread on a equal basis,but behold,some races have more neanderthal dna than others.some have more Denisovan dna than others.africans should have this dna if they descend from noah and noah had archaic hominin dna but they don't.I thought all living things except for what was put on the ark was destroyed?so it couldnt have been that only Hamites didnt mix with remnant neanderthals and denisovans.
the more plausible theory is that the Ark of noah is symbolic for the covenant that would be given to Christians and only those in this covenant would make it to paradisal gardens.
Origen in fact interpreted most of the Genesis account as allegory.
now my query about the Apocalypse is ,is it plausible that Erdogan is the antichrist like Walid Shoebat says?